New Orleans Judge Refuses Interracial Marriage License

Yes, you read that right. Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace for Tangipahoa Parish’s 8th Ward, refused to grant honor a license for an interracial marriage. And apparently his objection and refusal had been fairly well known before this story came out.

Nevermind that this issue was addressed waaaaay back in 1967, wherein the US Supreme Court unanimously decided that “Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.” [Loving v. Virginia]

He’s decided that he has to do it. For the Children.

That’s right. He’s worried about the children that might be born of such a union and that, in his personal opinion, interracial marriages just don’t last.

Based on what?

The Hammond Daily Star reports him as saying:

““I’m not a racist,” Bardwell said. “I do ceremonies for black couples right here in my house. My main concern is for the children.””

However, his objections is [also from the Hammond Daily Star]:

He said he has discussed the topic with blacks and whites, along with witnessing some interracial marriages. Bardwell said he came to the conclusion that most black society does not readily accept offspring of such relationships, and neither does white society.

“Yet, the children are innocent. They had nothing to do with that,” he said.

In many cases, he said, the grandparents or a relative ends up with the children.

“I don’t do interracial marriages because I don’t want to put children in a situation they didn’t bring on themselves,” Bardwell said. “In my heart, I feel the children will later suffer.”

Bardwell thinks that interracial marriages don’t last; therefor, kids born of such marriages end up with relatives due to divorce; therefor he shouldn’t do interracial marriages. Not only is this illegal and blatantly racist, it’s ignorant.

What studies will he produce to show that interracial marriages don’t work? And how does he go about proving that race was the deciding factor when a good many uniracial marriages also don’t work? Sadly, we have a Divorce culture in USAmerica.

I’m sorry that this man has found a way to justify and excuse his racism. As he’s stated, he does have rights, too. However, under the law and as a representative of the law, he has an obligation not to discriminate against anyone else.

That’s the rub these days: Everyone seems to have rights. Who any longer knows their responsibilites?

He’s stated that if he were ever got in trouble for refusing to perform an interracial ceremony, that he’d resign.

I think he should probably do so.

For a quickprimer on the Biblical Creationist position on Racism and Interracial Marriage, read:

Personally and as a minister, I think we need to toss the word “race” into the garbage can.  The idea of human races is an evolutionary by-product. The Bible teaches that there is only one human race, born of Adam and Eve.

-Sirius Knott

7 Comments Add yours

  1. Joe Batchelor says:

    You lie.

    “refused to grant a license”

    This is not true.

    Keith Bardwell did not violate any law.

    He did not deny them a license to marry,
    he simply denied to marry them,
    all well within his legal rights.

    According to the clerk of court’s office, …

    The license fee is $35, and the license must be signed by a Louisiana minister,

    justice of the peace or judge.

    The original is returned to the clerk’s office.

    They could have gone to a minister or a judge,
    but if they had come to our church the minister would also have turned them away.

    The JP did not prevent the marriage, but he was not required to perform it.

    1. Sirius says:


      Re: “You lie.”

      I didn’t. I simply mis-typed. I meant to say he refused to HONOR the license. My word choice was unfortunate and I apologize for any misunderstanding it may have caused. That said, I’d watch going around accusing folks of lying, sir. In God’s economy, what goes around comes around – only more so!

      Re: “If they had come to our church the minister would have also turned them away.”

      On what ground of Scripture would your so-called minister refuse an inter-racial marriage? Or are you saying you have the perfect right to condone biggtry in the name of Christ?

      I hope you’re not trying to justify your stained-glass racism with either Scriptorture of Acts 17:26 or I Corinthians 15:38-39. [I find this all too common amongst those Christians who insist they’re not racists, not really, but try to add a Scriptural seal of approval to their insistence on ecclesiastical segregation, as if there will separate seating arrangements in Heaven, and/or so-called racial purity. But your insistence on segregation and so-called racial purity betrays your refusal to submit to the authority of Scripture that we are in fact one blood and, more to the point, one Body in Christ.

      How do you justify this stained-glass biggotry, Joe?


  2. Thomas says:

    Just wanted to give you a heads up. I am writing a response on my site to your connection of evolution and racism. Not trying to bash you behind your back or anything. Just had a lot of thoughts on the issue that I wanted to write on my own site.

    1. Sirius says:


      Thanks for the heads up. I’ll be sure to check it out later.

      -Sirius Knott

  3. JStone says:

    Get over it. Nothing racist about this. Just an opinion.

    1. Sirius says:

      Back atcha. It’s completely racist opinion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s