We are given too little evidence to be certain, but too much to ignore.
– Blaise Pascal
This page is dedicated to blogs of an apologetical nature.
- The Crucifixion & the Issue of Blame – Why antiSemitism has no place in Christendom.
- Resurrection Apologetics – Why belief in Jesus’ historical existence, actual physical death and literal resurrection from the dead is reasonable given the evidence.
- Hypocrisy as Apologetic – Deflating the “Church is full of hypocrites” excuse. With special attention to historical gross hypocrisy like the Crusades, Inquisitions, Forced Conversions, TBN and the like.
- A Critique of the Archko Library – Whoever invented this thing was a pretty poor liar. Here’s why.
- The Bible Stands – ’nuff said.
- Deceived by Angels: Mormonism and Islam – A brief comparison of Islam, Mormonism and Christianity.
- Antitheism and Apatheism: Beyond Atheism and Agnosticism – How the new atheism and agnosticism differ from their forbears.
- When You’re Right, You’re Right – Why arguments, opinions and popularity have no bearing on truth.
- Higher Ignorance – At least the name’s accurate – Why the newest wave of postmodernism still falls flat.
- The Star of Bethlehem – Cool link.
- Faith-based Sci-Fi As Exploratory Apologetic – Exploration of science fiction themes from a Biblicist perspective.
- God in the Petri Dish – An exploration of the obviousness of God in His Creation in light of the requirement that He must be approched by faith.
- Friggin Reason – Why reliance upon Reason Alone is Impossible and used as a Straw Man [as Faith versus Reason]
- Why the Only Rational Atheist is an Oxymoron – Deflating the Flying Spaghetti Monster tactic.
- Russell’s Invisible Flying Pink Spaghetti Unicorn Monster Teapot – More comments on the weaknesses of the Flying Spaghetti Monster tactic, including notes about variations like Russell’s Teapot and Invisible Pink Unicorns.
- Why the Need for Interpretation Does NOT Prove a Religion False – A rebuttal to the claims of a few atheist bloggers who decided the Bible could not be of divine origin or else it would not require interpretation.
– Sirius Knott
