Theological Newspeak: Why Some Folks Call Me, Ken Ham and Other Biblical Creationists “Radical Liberals”

A few weeks ago, Joel Watts responded to one of my posts concerning the British Humanist Association’s efforts to mandate by law the exclusive and uncritical teaching of orthodox evolution in UK schools. He basically sided with the humanists that evolution needs legal protection. This is the usual reaction of extraBiblical creationists [those who give […]

Sign the Creation Letter!

On February 15, 2009, many well-meaning churches will celebrate an “Evolution Sunday.” This year’s push to encourage participation is expected to be particularly vocal, as 2009 will mark both the 200th birthday of Charles Darwin and the 150th anniversary of his book, Origins. The Kanawha Creation Science Group [KCSG] strongly discourages any Bible-believing Christian from […]

Questions for a Biblical Case for an Old Earth

Noticing the title, A Biblical Case for an Old Earth, of one of the Related Posts that WordPress linked to my Were Adam & Eve Real? post, I noticed something curious, nowhere did he actually USE THE BIBLE to make his “Biblical Case” for Old Earth. I’ve noted that the Clergy Letter Project approvingly links […]

Were Adam & Eve Real? A Critical Look at the Inconsistency of Long Age Compromise Creationism

The majority of this post originally appeared as comments on Eric Kemp’s Intelligence Science blog. I highly recommend that you read the post in question: Theistic Evolutionists and the Truth of Jesus: The Two Don’t Mix. I’ve been meaning to address the contradiction of their particular submission of the Bible to the authority of the […]

Why Naturalism Makes Darwin Unfalsifiable

Naturalism. By definition, it is the presupposition that the world came into being, developed [i.e. - evolved] to its present state and is sustained by purely material processes. God is not needed. Or so they hope. I think they’ve mistaken the concept of a God who is not wanted [by them, at any rate] with […]